Response from WWGroup PDF format.
Philip Ridley 25 February 2010
Head of Planning Services
Suffolk Coastal District Council
Suffolk IP12 1AU
Dear Mr Ridley,
Adastral Park Revised Planning Application, January 2010, No. C09/0555 Summary
1. The revised plan grossly underestimates the potential increase in recreational use of the Deben Estuary AONB . . . → Read More: Waldringfield Wildlife Group – BT Application
Documents submitted – NANT Response to BT additional documents Issued Jan 2010 and Response from Waldringfield Wildlife Group
The Cabinet met today and you will be disappointed, but probably not surprised, to learn that Cabinet voted unanimously to recommend the LDF Core Strategy to full Council for approval on 18th March. This is not good news. More details will be posted in the next day or two (28/2: sorry this taking a . . . → Read More: SCDC Cabinet Meeting Decision on LDF
We’ve been advised that the full Council meeting has also been moved – see above (please note change of time also). Please keep an eye on our website in case it gets moved again. Please try to attend both meetings (but especially the Full Council meeting) - it helps if they see the . . . → Read More: SCDC full Council meeting has been moved
The papers for the 24th Feb Cabinet meeting are now available HERE. The document CAB14-10-LDF sets out the Council’s proposal – ie to endorse the LDF with 2000 homes on the BT land at Martlesham.
The Minutes of the Scrutiny Committee are now available HERE
The Cabinet Meeting has been changed to 24th February – see above. New documents concerning BT’s planning application have been put on the SCDC website and the closing date for consultation is 25th February. We hope you find time to read at least some of the documents and respond to SCDC. Please cc us . . . → Read More: SCDC Cabinet Meeting has been changed to 24th February
The Scrutiny Committee continuation meeting finished at 5.30 pm today having started at 10am ! The most interesting part was the last 20 minutes when the Committee seemed to decide that they would recommend to Cabinet that the responses to the last round of consultation should be considered at an (extra?) LDF Task Group . . . → Read More: SCDC Scrutiny Committee continuation